EXAMPLE DELIVERABLES
The output matters more than the dashboard.
The table below is an illustrative, entirely synthetic example. No actual client systems, names or records were used.
EXAMPLE REPORT RSA-001
Revenue data change-risk assessment
Sample scope: fictional Product2, product-option relationships and linked commercial reference records.
REPORT EXAMPLE
31 OCT 2026
31 OCT 2026
Fictional records tested10,000
Illustrative exceptions126
Decision-needed groups18
Confirmed fixes0Read-only assessment
| ID | Example finding | Severity | Required decision | Test evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EX-001 | Two active products share a logical identifier with conflicting option mappings | High | Choose commercial master record; inspect downstream dependencies | Rule Q-07, sample A |
| EX-002 | Configuration constraint references a retired option | High | Validate expected behaviour with CPQ process owner | Rule Q-12, sample C |
| EX-003 | Historic quote line linked to a legacy product record | Medium | Preserve historical lineage in remediation design | Rule D-03, sample D |
| EX-004 | Active feature has no eligible options in the illustrative catalog | Medium | Confirm intent; add to test scenarios | Rule Q-16, sample E |
Illustrative recommendation
Do not consolidate flagged product records until the business owner signs off master-record and historical quote treatment. First perform a non-production dry run, reconcile linked records, and record the rollback method. These are example recommendations, not findings from a real environment.
Evidence + affected process + business decision + owner + next testDiscuss a real assessment ↗